Ph: 09 422 0598
Ph: 0274 792 328
larry@kauriglen.co.nz
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PENLINK FINAL S 122C REPORT

Impending Government Transport Policies

Imminent Policy Announce-ments  

The incumbent Labour/Alliance Coalition Government has foreshadowed the announcement of the soon to be released (possibly March 2002) National (New Zealand-wide) Transportation Strategy.  Its content, as referred to by the Prime Minister in her speech which opened the current session of Parliament will contain inter alia new policy relating to Territorial Local Authorities powers to build tolled roading projects.  The prospect of privately sourced funding for these projects is widely expected to accompany the announcement of the detailed policies.

The content and timing of these arrangements is obviously very significant for PENLINK.  The policies will affect long-term roading strategies for all New Zealand Councils.  This report has been required to be delivered by 28 February 2002 - any later and its impact would be lessened because of the short time remaining for its content to be absorbed and if circumstances warrant, for it to be debated.

This timing, of necessity excludes from the report any settled conclusions based on the imminent announcements of Transportation policies.

A "Fairer" Policy for Subsidies?

One exception to this position, albeit a somewhat speculative stance is the following brief commentary on the matter of Transfund subsidies.  There can be no guarantees that the current very unsatisfactory status of subsidies for tolled facilities will be adequately addressed in the announcements to come but it is likely that the existing law as it relates to Transfund's provision of roading subsidies will at least be revisited.

The present law relating to subsidy payments is highly unsatisfactory due to its inequities and the irrational (in an economic sense) application of Transfund subsidies.  The present circumstances give rise to the motorist paying twice - the so termed "double-dipping" that arises from the loss of subsidy in the PENLINK case and is referred to in more detail elsewhere in this report.

In simple terms what this means for PENLINK is this.  Merely because the Council if it were itself to complete PENLINK as a tolled road/bridge would deny the Council the entitlement to about $24 M of Transfund subsidy for the project - given the reasonable expectation that the project would in the foreseeable future meet Transfund subsidy requirements.

An iniquitous position then arises which means that the motorist (road-user), having paid petrol tax and or road user charges to furnish the monies for roading subsidies effectively loses the benefit of such payment and on top of this must also pay a toll to use the PENLINK road bridge.

Whether this state of affairs is properly resolved within the soon-to-be announced policies is of course a moot point.  Governments make the rules, iniquitous or not.  There is no guarantee that they would alter the existing policies but if economic sanity was to break out - they would.

RDC's Interest in the changes

At the time of writing "no one knows".  The matter of subsidy is so significant to PENLINK that an active interest - to the point of lobbying for a sane and equitable treatment of subsidy monies should be taken by the Rodney District Council.  It is in its ratepayers and motorists interests alike to do so.

As already referred to, CSL [ref;  CSL's Weiti Toll Road Option report, at page 14] included in their study a notional $10 M of subsidy monies to enable them to assess their impact.  The impact resulted in a large reduction of the tolling period and is therefore very significant.  Receipt of the full entitlement of the Transfund subsidy (together with the receipt of any grant monies) for PENLINK would, it is submitted, completely alter the weightings of the decisions involved.  The tolling period would be so much shorter than the privately funded alternative that the latter would scarcely be a tenable option.

With the significance of these factors in mind the Council should take every step necessary within its powers to inform itself, and if need be to promote its interests when the detailed Transportation policies are finally made public.  This matter ranks in significance with other major issues and is included with them in the relevant (final) section of this report.

There may well be other policy initiatives in the announcements that could affect the evaluation of PENLINK.  These too should be closely monitored.